Global Lead, Women's Protection and Empowerment Systems Transformation
Global Partnership for Education
New York NY HQ USA
Global Partnership for Education
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises, helping to restore health, safety, education, economic wellbeing, and power to people devastated by conflict and disaster. Founded in 1933 at the call of Albert Einstein, the IRC is one of the world's largest international humanitarian non-governmental organizations (INGO), at work in more than 40 countries and 29 U.S. cities helping people to survive, reclaim control of their future and strengthen their communities. A force for humanity, IRC employees deliver lasting impact by restoring safety, dignity and hope to millions. If you're a solutions-driven, passionate change-maker, come join us in positively impacting the lives of millions of people world-wide for a better future.
1. Background/IRC Summary: In 2007, the IRC began providing humanitarian assistance to vulnerable and crisis-affected people in Jordan in response to an influx of Iraqi refugees and the strain on host communities. Following the eruption of the Syrian war in 2011, hundreds of thousands of refugees crossed into Jordan. The ongoing insecurity in Syria and the growing needs of refugees have strained Jordan’s resources and infrastructure and exacerbated pre-existing issues like water scarcity and high unemployment. As resources become more limited, refugees and host communities have fewer economic opportunities and become more vulnerable. The IRC’s strategy for Jordan shows our commitment to improving the safety, health, education, and economic well-being of people affected by conflict, in camp-based (Za’atari camp) refugees and urban-based refugees as well as vulnerable Jordanian host community, in coordination with the humanitarian community and the Government of Jordan. Simultaneously, IRC in Jordan is pivoting to a more long-term resilience/development programming responding to the context in Jordan and the worsening vulnerabilities faced by refugees and vulnerable Jordanians. The International Rescue Committee (IRC) in Jordan is implementing an integration activity between its Economic Recovery and Development (ERD) and Early Childhood Development (ECD) programs, funded by the LEGO Foundation. The activity builds on capacity-building support previously provided to four community-based organizations (CBOs) under the ECD program and now seeks to help these CBOs implement a social enterprise model building a business that funds their social programs.
1.1 The “Social Enterprise” Model The model to be applied is a mission-driven business approach that balances financial sustainability with social impact. It is designed to help civil society actors plan for sustainability beyond project funding; recognizing that CBOs and CSOs are heavily reliant on external funding from international organizations and donors by exploring diversified, sustainable revenue streams, including potential private sector collaboration. The model aims to address youth and women unemployment, support marginalized communities, and promote economic resilience, with the CSO sustaining its own running costs and reinvesting profit into the business and/or expand their community-based initiatives. The four partner CBOs are in four different locations:
Each CBO received support through the initial ECD capacity-building phase prior to this activity. During the previous phase, the CBOs participated in a series of Early Childhood Development (ECD) trainings covering key topics such as Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), Learning through Play, and other evidence-based approaches to quality ECD programming. The CBOs subsequently implemented ECD activities for children aged 3 to 8 years within their communities. Throughout the implementation phase, IRC technical staff and the implementing partner conducted regular field visits to observe service delivery, provide coaching and constructive feedback to facilitators, and strengthen the CBOs' capacity to deliver high-quality, sustainable ECD services. The upcoming activity focuses on strengthening the long-term sustainability of the CBOs through social enterprise development.
2. Purpose and Objectives of the Assignment The IRC is seeking a qualified national individual consultant to work directly with the four partner CBOs to develop viable, context-appropriate social enterprise concepts within a defined funding ceiling, build their capacity to implement them, and support IRC in identifying which CBOs are best positioned to receive follow-on implementation funding. Specifically, the assignment aims to:
3. SCOPE OF WORK: 3.1 Legal and Regulatory Screening For each CBO, the consultant will complete a screening checklist (not a standalone legal opinion) covering the CBO's registration authority (Ministry of Social Development, Ministry of Interior, or Companies Control Department, as applicable), and whether its current registration permits it to generate, retain, and reinvest commercial income without triggering restructuring, loss of non-profit status, or unexpected tax exposure. Findings feed directly into the feasibility of the business idea developed. 3.2 Market and Organizational Readiness Assessment
3.3 Training
3.4 Ideation Based on the Market Assessment, the consultant will facilitate a participatory ideation process with each CBO's leadership and relevant staff/volunteers to generate and select one viable social enterprise idea per CBO. Ideation must observe the following constraints:
3.5 Financial Modeling For each CBO, the consultant will build a financial model: startup costs, pricing, break-even point, and a 12–24-month cash flow projection that fits within the allocated budget ceiling. A standardized model template, lightly customized per CBO, should be used to keep this efficient within the assignment's day budget. 3.6 Profit Governance and Reinvestment Mechanism For each CBO, the consultant will design a simple mechanism governing how business profit is allocated; covering running costs, reinvestment into the business, and/or reinvestment into other community initiatives including decision rights and basic financial transparency and controls. 3.7 Risk and Do No Harm Screen A lightweight risk screen per CBO, with support from IRC team members, covering reputational risk (perceived profiteering), conflict-of-interest risk (e.g. board members personally benefiting), and community-perception risk (e.g. perceived favoritism), embedded within the assessment and ideation phases rather than run as a standalone task. 3.8 Selection Criteria and Panel The consultant will propose a selection methodology applying the following weighting, for IRC's review and sign-off before the panel convenes: Financial viability: 55% Social impact potential: 25% Organizational readiness: 20% On completion of ideation, financial modeling, and training, the consultant will compile a comparative assessment of all four CBOs against these criteria and participate in a joint selection panel with IRC appointed staff. The consultant prepares supporting documentation and a recommendation; the final selection decision is taken based on a voting mechanism following the panel review. Regardless of outcome, all four CBOs receive their full business concept note and financial model to pursue independently.
1. Inception Report Refined methodology, workplan, and standardized templates, including the financial model, profit-governance mechanism, and screening checklists. Timing: 10 days after signing
2. Combined Market and Organizational Readiness Assessment Report Combined market and organizational readiness assessment report for each CBO (4 reports in total).
3. Legal/Regulatory Screening Checklist Legal/regulatory screening checklist for each CBO, embedded within the respective assessment report.
4. Joint Training Session Materials and Attendance Records Preparation and delivery of joint training session materials, together with attendance records.
5. Separate CBO-Premise Training/Coaching Separate training and coaching sessions conducted at each CBO's premises.
6. Validated Business Concept Note Validated business concept note for each CBO, within the allocated budget ceiling (4 concept notes in total).
7. Financial Model per CBO Financial model for each CBO, developed within the allocated budget ceiling (4 financial models in total).
8. Profit Governance and Reinvestment Mechanism Note Profit governance and reinvestment mechanism note for each CBO (4 notes in total).
9. Comparative Assessment and Selection Panel Document Comparative assessment and selection panel document, including participation in the selection panel and recommendation of the top two CBOs.
10. CBO Coaching Records Report CBO coaching records report covering all four CBOs.
11. Final Consultancy Report Final consultancy report summarizing the methodology, findings, and outcomes.
5. Duration, Budget, and Logistics
Calendar duration is estimated at 4-5 months, allowing for sequencing across four CBO locations and joint training logistics. CBO travel and venue rental (for joint and separate training sessions) are covered under a separate IRC budget line and are not part of the consultant's fee or responsibility.
6. Location and Travel
Fieldwork will take place in Jordan across four locations: Mafraq, Rusaifa, Amman, and Ma'an. Report writing and preparation may be conducted remotely. IRC will confirm logistical arrangements for venue rental and CBO travel costs for joint training sessions during contracting. Consultant accommodation in Ma’an is covered by the IRC (during visits and on-site training).
7. Management and Reporting Arrangements The consultant will report to the ERD Program Lead. IRC will facilitate introductions to the four CBOs and provide access to relevant background documentation from the prior ECD capacity-building phase. The consultant is expected to maintain regular check-ins with IRC and flag any risks, delays, or scope pressures (e.g. a CBO requiring materially more time than budgeted) promptly.
8. Requirements:
Working Environment: This assignment is based remotely with frequent travel to implementation sites. The security situation in the IRC intervention areas is calm and the security department of IRC shares regular security updates to keep the management and staff informed about the new developments.
Professional Standards: All International Rescue Committee workers must adhere to the core values and principles outlined in IRC Way - Standards for Professional Conduct. Our Standards are Integrity, Service, Equality and Accountability. In accordance with these values, the IRC operates and enforces policies on Safeguarding, Conflicts of Interest, Fiscal Integrity, and Reporting Wrongdoing and Protection from Retaliation. IRC is committed to take all necessary preventive measures and create an environment where people feel safe, and to take all necessary actions and corrective measures when harm occurs. IRC builds teams of professionals who promote critical reflection, power sharing, debate, and objectivity to deliver the best possible services to our clients.
Cookies: https://careers.rescue.org/us/en/cookiesettings
Seen 4 hours ago.
Original posting on Global Partnership for Education's site ↗
Posting text belongs to the employer. Removal requests: contact us.
Nearby
Same employer first, then the same role elsewhere.
Global Partnership for Education
New York NY HQ USA
Global Partnership for Education
Kabul, Afghanistan
Global Partnership for Education
Richmond, VA USA
Global Partnership for Education
Beni Democratic Republic of the Congo
Global Partnership for Education
Butembo, Democratic Republic of the Congo
One job at a time
Pick the job you actually want and we write for it.