Skip to content

Open nowPosted 13 days ago

AI Engineer - Generative AI and Agents

Workable (global search)108,016 open roles

Where
Argentina
Work mode
Remote
Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

Your applicationOpen nowAI Engineer - Generative AI and AgentsWorkable (global search) · Argentina
  1. YouYes, apply to this one.

  2. CV RocketCV written for this posting.

  3. 25 readersRecruiter, hiring manager, skeptic. Round after round.

  4. CV RocketApplied on Workable (global search)'s own form.

The reply lands in your private mailbox

3×more interviews than doing it yourself with ChatGPT.

The clock on this job

Early applications get read.

7.9% of postings close within 7 days. Measured by our own scanner across the market. Workable (global search) postings stay open a median of 7 days.

Share of postings closed within
  1. 1.6%1 day
  2. 3.6%3 days
  3. 7.9%7 days
  4. 14.9%14 days
  5. 34.0%30 days
This job: posted 13 days ago

Workable (global search) median: 7 days open

The posting

Azumo builds and operates production AI systems for companies ranging from seed-stage startups to Meta. We are hiring an AI Engineer to own what those systems do once they are live: retrieval pipelines, tool-using agents, evaluation harnesses, and the guardrails that keep them dependable in front of real users. The role is fully remote across Latin America, aligned to your client's working day.

You will not be building demos. Azumo has shipped production AI since 2016, and the work here starts where the prototype ends, making a system reliable, measurable, and affordable enough to put in front of customers.

Where this role sits

Azumo's engineering organization is built around four lanes. The Data Engineer lane owns pipelines, storage, and the retrieval layer. The Data Scientist lane owns the question and the method. The Software Engineer lane owns AI-augmented product delivery. This role is the AI Engineer lane, and it owns production behavior.

One question places the boundary: when the output is wrong, whose problem is it? "The method was inappropriate" is a Data Scientist question. "The system did the wrong thing with an appropriate method" is yours.

Not quite your profile? Check our other openings:

If you build the pipelines and retrieval layer models depend on — Data Engineer If you decide what to measure and which method answers it — Data Scientist If you ship product software with agents in your toolchain — AI-Augmented Software Engineer If you've done all of the above and answered to the client directly — Forward Deployed Engineer

What you will build

  • Retrieval systems. Chunking and embedding pipelines, hybrid search, reranking, and evaluation of retrieval quality, built on pgvector, Pinecone, Qdrant, FAISS, or Azure AI Search.
  • Agentic workflows. Stateful multi-step execution, tool calling, MCP servers, structured output enforcement, context-window management, deterministic fallbacks, and human-in-the-loop gates for the decisions that need one.
  • Evaluation. Test sets that reflect the decision the system is actually making, model-as-judge scoring, regression tracking across prompt and model changes, and honest error analysis. If a change made the system better, you should be able to prove it.
  • Reliability and safety. Prompt-injection defense, output validation, guardrails, PII handling, and graceful degradation when a model or tool call fails.
  • Production operation. Containerized deployment on Azure or AWS, CI/CD, observability, and explicit latency, cost, and token budgets that you own rather than discover after the invoice.
  • Work inside the client's environment. Their repositories, their standups, sometimes their customer calls. Azumo is SOC 2 certified, client code stays in client repositories, and some engagements carry additional requirements such as HIPAA.

How we work

Our engineers build with AI every day. Claude Code, Codex, and similar tools are part of the standard toolchain here, not an experiment. We run an automated audit across the whole codebase on day one and every day after, grading security, cost, and architecture findings by severity with the exact file and line, so a small team can move quickly without quality drifting. We stay vendor-neutral across OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-weight models, and we run Valkyrie, our own production layer, when a single interface to any model is the right call.

About Azumo

Azumo is a San Francisco based software development company that has been building intelligent applications since 2016. We provide nearshore AI engineering teams to organizations that need production AI faster than they can hire for it: as an embedded engineering team, as AI staff augmentation alongside an existing team, or as a full project build. Our engineers work from Latin America, aligned to United States time zones, and have delivered for Twitter, Meta, Discovery Channel, Omnicom, UnitedHealth, and CENTEGIX.

We hire for seniority and test for it before anyone joins a client team. We support engineers in going deep on the modern AI stack, and we give time back to open-source work, community teaching, and philanthropy.

Apply at https://azumo.com/join-our-team or write to us at [email protected].

Requirements

Basic qualifications

  • 4+ years building and shipping production software, with a modern backend language (e.g., Python) as your primary focus, plus the engineering fundamentals that go with it: testing, code review, CI/CD, Git, containers, API design, and async programming.
  • Demonstrable production experience with LLM-based systems: retrieval-augmented generation, function and tool calling, structured output enforcement, and prompt design as an engineering discipline rather than trial and error.
  • Hands-on work with vector and retrieval infrastructure such as pgvector, Pinecone, Qdrant, FAISS, or Azure AI Search, including the retrieval-quality problems that come with it.
  • Experience with agent frameworks and tooling: LangGraph, LangChain, CrewAI, the Model Context Protocol (MCP), or native Python execution loops. We care that you have shipped a stateful, tool-using system, not which framework you used.
  • You have built an evaluation suite for an LLM system. Test-set design, model-as-judge or equivalent scoring, and regression tracking with Langfuse, Ragas, LangSmith, or something you wrote yourself. This is the requirement we screen hardest on.
  • Cloud deployment experience, Azure preferred and AWS acceptable, with Docker, CI/CD pipelines, and infrastructure as code (GitHub Actions, Terraform, or Bicep).
  • Working discipline around latency, token cost, and throughput. You can explain what a feature costs to run and what you did about it.
  • Active use of AI-assisted coding tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, or GitHub Copilot in real delivery work.
  • Clear written and spoken English, C1 or above, and the confidence to explain a technical trade-off directly to a client.
  • Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Data Science, or a related field, or equivalent professional experience.

Preferred qualifications

  • Fine-tuning and adaptation of open-weight models: LoRA, QLoRA, PEFT, and a clear view of when fine-tuning is the wrong answer.
  • Self-hosted or open-weight inference and serving, and the cost and latency trade-offs against hosted APIs.
  • Multimodal systems covering vision, speech, or document understanding alongside text.
  • Security work specific to LLM systems: prompt-injection testing, red-teaming, and output sanitization.
  • Delivery under a compliance regime such as SOC 2 or HIPAA.
  • Streaming, real-time, or high-throughput inference workloads.
  • Contributions to open-source AI libraries, published technical writing, or active participation in the AI engineering community.

Benefits

  • 100% remote-first culture (work anywhere in Latin America)
  • Paid time off (PTO)·
  • U.S. Holidays·
  • AI Training and certifications·
  • Mentored career development·
  • Profit sharing·
  • $US remuneration.
From $25, paid onceGet the CV for this job

What happens when you press

One press. We do the rest.

  1. A CV for this posting

    Written against Workable (global search)'s own wording, from every piece of relevant proof in your profile.

  2. 25 readers review it

    Recruiter, hiring manager, skeptic and more read every draft, round after round. You get the best round.

    The review screen in CV Rocket: how each CV was read, round by round.
  3. We apply on Workable (global search)'s form

    Our application engine gets through the hardest forms there are. Where a question needs you, AI suggests the best answer. Don't want us applying from our IP addresses? Use our Chrome extension: we apply straight from your own browser.

    An application in CV Rocket: every answer filled in on the employer's form.
  4. Every reply, sorted

    Workable (global search)'s answer lands in your private mailbox, and we classify it on arrival: interview, question, rejection.

    The CV Rocket inbox: each employer reply classified as an interview, an action or a rejection.
  5. Reply with AI

    AI helps you write the email, checks it and sends it. We show you whether the recruiter read it.

  6. The interview in your calendar

    Full integration with your calendar. The invitation goes straight in.

    An interview invitation in the CV Rocket inbox, added to the candidate's calendar.
Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

Why it works

3×

more interviews than doing it yourself with ChatGPT.

ChatGPT writes a CV and never learns what happened to it. We see every reply. For each CV we know:

  • How it was written, and how the review scored it
  • When we applied, and how long after the posting went up
  • Which posting, which company, which city
  • Who got the interview, and who heard nothing

That is how we know which CVs get called.

Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

The numbers game

More applications. More interviews.

Every application goes out with its own CV, written for that posting and paid once. Send enough of them and the law of large numbers finds you the job.

By hand5–10
With CV Rocket100
applications a day

Nearby

Live postings like this one

Same employer first, then the same role elsewhere.

Before you press

Straight answers

Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

What if my background isn't good enough?

We make the most of the background you have. The CV uses every piece of relevant proof your profile holds, and one of the 25 readers reads your whole profile and flags what the CV left out.

Do you really apply for me?

Yes, on the employer's own form, the hardest ones included. Where a question needs you, you answer it right there and AI suggests the best answer. Don't want us applying from our IP addresses? Use our Chrome extension: we apply straight from your own browser.

Is it a subscription?

No. You pay once per CV, from $25. Every application goes out with its own CV, written for that posting.

One job. One CV.
Paid once.

Pick the posting you want. We write for it, apply for you and catch the reply.

Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.