Skip to content
CV Rocket
Get started
How it worksThe enginePricingBlogContactSign in

Open nowPosted 390 days ago

Prompt Engineer (Founding Team)

gradientflo19 open roles

Pay
$24,000 – $32,000 a yearly
Where
Hyderābād, India
Work mode
On site
Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

Your applicationOpen nowPrompt Engineer (Founding Team)gradientflo · Hyderābād, India

  1. YouYes, apply to this one.

  2. CV RocketCV written for this posting.

  3. 25 readersRecruiter, hiring manager, skeptic. Round after round.

  4. CV RocketApplied on gradientflo's own form.

The reply lands in your private mailbox

3×more interviews than doing it yourself with ChatGPT.

The clock on this job

Early applications get read.

12.1% of postings close within 7 days. Measured by our own scanner across the market.

Share of postings closed within
  1. 2.1%1 day
  2. 4.5%3 days
  3. 12.1%7 days
  4. 19.1%14 days
  5. 35.6%30 days
  6. 52.7%60 days
This job: posted 390 days ago

The posting

Role Overview

You will be the language architect of Vibecoderz. The TutorAgent and its family of sub-agents only think as clearly as the prompts that guide them — and you will design those “thought patterns.” As the founding Prompt Engineer, you’ll build a prompt library and evaluation system that ensures Vibecoderz produces consistent, safe, and high-quality artifacts: slides, quizzes, code snippets, and runnable mini-apps.

This is a role for a builder of mental scaffolding. You’ll be deeply involved in orchestrating system prompts, tool schemas, chaining strategies, and eval frameworks that make our AI both reliable and delightful. You’ll collaborate with AI Engineers on orchestration, Backend Engineers on schema integration, and PM on defining product outcomes.

You’ll use Linear for execution, Notion for prompt specs and experiments, and GitHub for version control, making every iteration observable, testable, and reproducible.

Key Responsibilities

  1. Prompt Library Ownership - Design, version, and maintain system prompts for TutorAgent, PlannerAgent, CodeAgent, QuizAgent, and ContentAgent.
  2. Prompt Chaining & Orchestration - Implement advanced strategies: reflection, planning, few-shot, self-consistency, and tool-use flows.
  3. Schema Definition - Collaborate with BE and AI engineers to define JSON schemas and tool contracts that LLMs must respect.
  4. Evaluation Pipelines - Use LangSmith or Langfuse to build eval frameworks that test accuracy, latency, drift, and hallucination rates.
  5. Performance Optimization - Continuously refine prompts to minimize cost and latency while maximizing reliability and user trust.
  6. Hybrid Model Router Support - Adapt prompt strategies for Gemini Flash vs. Pro vs. Claude depending on use case (speed vs. depth).
  7. Guardrails & Safety - Embed safety layers in prompts to prevent unsafe, biased, or irrelevant outputs.
  8. RAG Integration - Build prompt strategies for retrieval-augmented generation (GitHub docs, MDN, StackOverflow).
  9. Documentation & Experimentation - Maintain prompt playbooks in Notion, documenting rationale, variations, and outcomes for reproducibility.
  10. Cross-Team Collaboration - Work with PM to translate learning flows into prompt chains, AI engineers for orchestration, and QA for regression testing.
  11. Problem Solving - Debug prompt failures, identify root causes (model vs. schema vs. orchestration), and propose iterative solutions.

Success Metrics

90 Days (Probation):

  • Deliver prompt library v1 for TutorAgent, PlannerAgent, and QuizAgent.
  • Build baseline LangSmith eval pipeline with at least 20 golden prompts.
  • Achieve <15% hallucination rate in core flows.

12 Months:

  • Maintain <5% hallucination rate across all core workflows.
  • Prompt system powering 10+ specialized agents in production.
  • Automated regression evals integrated into CI/CD pipeline.
  • AI outputs powering >50% of artifacts with consistent schema compliance.

Must-Haves

  • 10+ years in NLP, prompt engineering, or applied AI.
  • Expertise in LLM prompting strategies and evaluation frameworks.
  • Strong grasp of JSON schema enforcement, tool-use, and prompt chaining.
  • Proven ability to debug and refine AI outputs in production products.
  • Product company background with evidence of shipping AI-first systems.

Nice-to-Haves

  • Contributions to LangChain, CrewAI, or LangSmith open source.
  • Research background in prompt optimization, LLM evals, or safety.
  • Prior work on developer-facing AI tutor or EdTech products.
  • Startup/founding engineer experience.

Tech Stack Visibility

  • Prompting & Orchestration: LangSmith, Langfuse, Google ADK
  • Models: Gemini Pro, Gemini Flash, Gemini Vision, Gemini Live API, Claude 3 Opus
  • Data: Firestore, Redis, Neo4j (schema enforcement targets)
  • Infra: Cloud Run, Pub/Sub for agent comms
  • CI/CD: GitHub Actions with prompt regression evals
  • Tools: Linear (execution), Notion (prompt specs), GitHub (prompt versions)

Assessment

Objective: Validate ability to design, evaluate, and optimize a prompt system powering multi-agent tutoring.

Challenge (Candidate PoC):

  1. Design system prompts for: TutorAgent: teaching “React Hooks.” QuizAgent: generating 5 MCQs with answers + explanations. CodeAgent: generating runnable JS snippets.
  2. Implement prompt chaining strategy for: Outline → Lesson → Quiz → Mini-App.
  3. Build a LangSmith eval pipeline: Test against 20 golden prompts. Measure accuracy, latency, hallucination rate, schema compliance.
  4. Optimize: Compare Gemini Flash vs. Pro routing for cost/latency. Document tradeoffs and improvements.

Deliverables:

  • Prompt library (YAML/JSON).
  • Eval report with metrics table (baseline vs. optimized).
  • GitHub repo with eval scripts + LangSmith integration.
  • Notion doc summarizing prompt strategies.
  • 5-min Loom walkthrough of the workflow.

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Prompt Design & Schema Compliance (30%)
  • Prompt Chaining & Orchestration Strategy (20%)
  • Evaluation Pipeline & Metrics (20%)
  • Performance Optimization (15%)
  • Documentation & Reproducibility (15%)
From $25, paid onceGet the CV for this job

What happens when you press

One press. We do the rest.

  1. A CV for this posting

    Written against gradientflo's own wording, from every piece of relevant proof in your profile.

  2. 25 readers review it

    Recruiter, hiring manager, skeptic and more read every draft, round after round. You get the best round.

    The review screen in CV Rocket: how each CV was read, round by round.

  3. We apply on gradientflo's form

    Our application engine gets through the hardest forms there are. Where a question needs you, AI suggests the best answer. Don't want us applying from our IP addresses? Use our Chrome extension: we apply straight from your own browser.

    An application in CV Rocket: every answer filled in on the employer's form.

  4. Every reply, sorted

    gradientflo's answer lands in your private mailbox, and we classify it on arrival: interview, question, rejection.

    The CV Rocket inbox: each employer reply classified as an interview, an action or a rejection.

  5. Reply with AI

    AI helps you write the email, checks it and sends it. We show you whether the recruiter read it.

  6. The interview in your calendar

    Full integration with your calendar. The invitation goes straight in.

    An interview invitation in the CV Rocket inbox, added to the candidate's calendar.
Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

Why it works

3×

more interviews than doing it yourself with ChatGPT.

ChatGPT writes a CV and never learns what happened to it. We see every reply. For each CV we know:

  • How it was written, and how the review scored it
  • When we applied, and how long after the posting went up
  • Which posting, which company, which city
  • Who got the interview, and who heard nothing

That is how we know which CVs get called.

Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

The numbers game

More applications. More interviews.

Every application goes out with its own CV, written for that posting and paid once. Send enough of them and the law of large numbers finds you the job.

Get the CV for this job
By hand5–10
With CV Rocket100
applications a day

Nearby

Live postings like this one

Same employer first, then the same role elsewhere.

Before you press

Straight answers

Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.

What if my background isn't good enough?

We make the most of the background you have. The CV uses every piece of relevant proof your profile holds, and one of the 25 readers reads your whole profile and flags what the CV left out.

Do you really apply for me?

Yes, on the employer's own form, the hardest ones included. Where a question needs you, you answer it right there and AI suggests the best answer. Don't want us applying from our IP addresses? Use our Chrome extension: we apply straight from your own browser.

Is it a subscription?

No. You pay once per CV, from $25. Every application goes out with its own CV, written for that posting.

One job. One CV.
Paid once.

Pick the posting you want. We write for it, apply for you and catch the reply.

Get the CV for this job

From $25 per CV, paid once. No subscription.